Christian Classics
‹ Works of Jonathan Edwards, Volume One
Contents
The Works of Jonathan Edwards, Volume 1CHAPTER I. Birth. Parentage. Early religious advantages. Serious impressions and account of his experienceCHAPTER II. Intellectual progress. Earliest productions. Entrance at college. Mental habitsCHAPTER III. Early religious productions. Miscellanies. Notes on the Scriptures. Commencement of his preaching. Resolutions.CHAPTER IV. His DiaryCHAPTER V. His tutorship. Sickness. Invitation to Northampton. Personal narrative continued. Diary concluded.CHAPTER VI. Settlement in the ministry at Northampton. Situation of things at the time of his settlement. Attention to religion in the parish. Course of study. Habits of life. Marriage. Death and Character of Mr. Stoddard. Sickness of Mr. Edwards. Death and character of his sister Jerusha. His first publicationCHAPTER VII. Remarkable revival of religion, in 1734, and 1735. Its extent and power. Manner of treating awakened sinners. Causes of its decline. Religious controversy in Hampshire. Death of his sister Lucy. Characteristics of Mrs. Edwards. Remainder of personal narrativeCHAPTER VIII. Narrative of Surprising Conversions. His views of revivals. Five Discourses. Mr. Bellamy, a resident in his family. Extra-parochial labours of Mr. Edwards. Sermon at Enfield. Funeral Sermon on the Rev. W. WilliamsCHAPTER IX. Commencement of a second great revival of religion, in the spring and summer of 1740. Visit of Mr. Whitefield at Northampton. Impulses. Judging of the religious character of others. Letter to Mr. Wheelock. Great effects of a private lecture of Mr. E. Letter to his daughter. Letter to a young lady in Connecticut. Lay preaching. Letter of Rev. G. Tennent. Sermon at New-Haven. 'Distinguishing Marks of a Work of the Spirit of God.' Prefaces by Mr. Cooper and Mr. Willison. Mr. Samuel HopkinsCHAPTER X. Temporary abatement of religious attention. Letter to Mr. Bellamy. Missionary tour. Success at Leicester. Mr. Hopkins becomes a member of his family. Mr. Buell's successful labours at Northampton. Mr. Edwards's narrative of the revival at Northampton, in 1740-1742. Covenant entered into by the churchCHAPTER XI. Mrs. Edwards. Her solemn self-dedications. Her uncommon discoveries of the Divine perfections and glory; and of the excellency of Christ. Remarks concerning themCHAPTER XII. Extent of the revival of 1740-1742. Auspicious opening. Opposed by its enemies, and injured by its friends. “Thoughts on the Revival in New England. ” Attestations of numerous ministers. Causes of its decline. Influence of Mr. Whitefield, Mr. Tennent, and others. Influence of Mr. Edwards's publications in Scotland. Great revival of religion there. His correspondents in that country. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. Answer to do. Letter from Mr. RobeChapter XIII. First Interview with David Brainerd--Separations From Churches--Letter to Rev. Mr. WhimanCHAPTER XIV. Mistakes extensively prevalent at this time, as to the nature and evidences of true godliness. “Treatise on Religious Affections.” Design and character of the work. Republished abroad. Letter from Mr. Gillespie concerning it. Letter from Mr. Edwards to Mr. M'Cullock. Reply to Mr. Gillespie. Proposal made in Scotland, for united extraordinary prayer. Efforts of Mr. Edwards to promote it. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. “Humble Attempt to promote Extraordinary Prayer” · Part 1CHAPTER XIV. Mistakes extensively prevalent at this time, as to the nature and evidences of true godliness. “Treatise on Religious Affections.” Design and character of the work. Republished abroad. Letter from Mr. Gillespie concerning it. Letter from Mr. Edwards to Mr. M'Cullock. Reply to Mr. Gillespie. Proposal made in Scotland, for united extraordinary prayer. Efforts of Mr. Edwards to promote it. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. “Humble Attempt to promote Extraordinary Prayer” · Part 2CHAPTER XIV. Mistakes extensively prevalent at this time, as to the nature and evidences of true godliness. “Treatise on Religious Affections.” Design and character of the work. Republished abroad. Letter from Mr. Gillespie concerning it. Letter from Mr. Edwards to Mr. M'Cullock. Reply to Mr. Gillespie. Proposal made in Scotland, for united extraordinary prayer. Efforts of Mr. Edwards to promote it. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. “Humble Attempt to promote Extraordinary Prayer” · Part 3CHAPTER XV. Arrival of David Brainerd at Northampton. His sickness and death at the house of Mr. Edwards. His papers. Death of Jerusha, the second daughter of Mr. E. Her character. Correspondence of Mr. E. with Rev. John Erskine. Abstract of Mr. E.'s first letter to Mr. Erskine. Plan conceived of the Freedom of the Will. Death of Col. Stoddard. Kindness of Mr. Erskine. Letter of Mr. E. to him. Second Letter from Mr. Gillespie. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. Letter to Mr. Erskine. Letter from Mr. Willison. Life and diary of Brainerd. Letters to Messrs. Erskine, M'Cullock, and Robe. Ordination of Rev. Job Strong. Anecdote of Rev. Mr. Moody. Letter of Mr. E. to his daughter Mary. Second Letter to Mr. Gillespie · Part 1CHAPTER XV. Arrival of David Brainerd at Northampton. His sickness and death at the house of Mr. Edwards. His papers. Death of Jerusha, the second daughter of Mr. E. Her character. Correspondence of Mr. E. with Rev. John Erskine. Abstract of Mr. E.'s first letter to Mr. Erskine. Plan conceived of the Freedom of the Will. Death of Col. Stoddard. Kindness of Mr. Erskine. Letter of Mr. E. to him. Second Letter from Mr. Gillespie. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. Letter to Mr. Erskine. Letter from Mr. Willison. Life and diary of Brainerd. Letters to Messrs. Erskine, M'Cullock, and Robe. Ordination of Rev. Job Strong. Anecdote of Rev. Mr. Moody. Letter of Mr. E. to his daughter Mary. Second Letter to Mr. Gillespie · Part 2CHAPTER XV. Arrival of David Brainerd at Northampton. His sickness and death at the house of Mr. Edwards. His papers. Death of Jerusha, the second daughter of Mr. E. Her character. Correspondence of Mr. E. with Rev. John Erskine. Abstract of Mr. E.'s first letter to Mr. Erskine. Plan conceived of the Freedom of the Will. Death of Col. Stoddard. Kindness of Mr. Erskine. Letter of Mr. E. to him. Second Letter from Mr. Gillespie. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. Letter to Mr. Erskine. Letter from Mr. Willison. Life and diary of Brainerd. Letters to Messrs. Erskine, M'Cullock, and Robe. Ordination of Rev. Job Strong. Anecdote of Rev. Mr. Moody. Letter of Mr. E. to his daughter Mary. Second Letter to Mr. Gillespie · Part 3CHAPTER XV. Arrival of David Brainerd at Northampton. His sickness and death at the house of Mr. Edwards. His papers. Death of Jerusha, the second daughter of Mr. E. Her character. Correspondence of Mr. E. with Rev. John Erskine. Abstract of Mr. E.'s first letter to Mr. Erskine. Plan conceived of the Freedom of the Will. Death of Col. Stoddard. Kindness of Mr. Erskine. Letter of Mr. E. to him. Second Letter from Mr. Gillespie. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. Letter to Mr. Erskine. Letter from Mr. Willison. Life and diary of Brainerd. Letters to Messrs. Erskine, M'Cullock, and Robe. Ordination of Rev. Job Strong. Anecdote of Rev. Mr. Moody. Letter of Mr. E. to his daughter Mary. Second Letter to Mr. Gillespie · Part 4CHAPTER XV. Arrival of David Brainerd at Northampton. His sickness and death at the house of Mr. Edwards. His papers. Death of Jerusha, the second daughter of Mr. E. Her character. Correspondence of Mr. E. with Rev. John Erskine. Abstract of Mr. E.'s first letter to Mr. Erskine. Plan conceived of the Freedom of the Will. Death of Col. Stoddard. Kindness of Mr. Erskine. Letter of Mr. E. to him. Second Letter from Mr. Gillespie. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. Letter to Mr. Erskine. Letter from Mr. Willison. Life and diary of Brainerd. Letters to Messrs. Erskine, M'Cullock, and Robe. Ordination of Rev. Job Strong. Anecdote of Rev. Mr. Moody. Letter of Mr. E. to his daughter Mary. Second Letter to Mr. Gillespie · Part 5CHAPTER XVI. Commencement of difficulties at NorthamptonCHAPTER XVII. Account of difficulties at Northampton continuedCHAPTER XVIII. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock—to Mr. Erskine. Account of the troubles at Northampton concludedThe Works of Jonathan Edwards, Volume 1 · CHAPTER XIXCHAPTER XX. Letter to Sir W. Pepperell. Letter to Lady Pepperell. Letter to his father. Arrival of Mr. Hawley. Increasing importance of Indian establishments. Schemes of its enemies. Firm stand taken by Mr. Edwards. Letter to Mr. Oliver. Letter to commissioners. Difficulties of the mission. Answer to Mr. Williams. Letter to the people of Northampton. Marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Burr. Letter To Mr. Erskine. Letter to Mr. Hollis. Letter to Mr. Hubbard · Part 1CHAPTER XX. Letter to Sir W. Pepperell. Letter to Lady Pepperell. Letter to his father. Arrival of Mr. Hawley. Increasing importance of Indian establishments. Schemes of its enemies. Firm stand taken by Mr. Edwards. Letter to Mr. Oliver. Letter to commissioners. Difficulties of the mission. Answer to Mr. Williams. Letter to the people of Northampton. Marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Burr. Letter To Mr. Erskine. Letter to Mr. Hollis. Letter to Mr. Hubbard · Part 2CHAPTER XX. Letter to Sir W. Pepperell. Letter to Lady Pepperell. Letter to his father. Arrival of Mr. Hawley. Increasing importance of Indian establishments. Schemes of its enemies. Firm stand taken by Mr. Edwards. Letter to Mr. Oliver. Letter to commissioners. Difficulties of the mission. Answer to Mr. Williams. Letter to the people of Northampton. Marriage of Mr. and Mrs. Burr. Letter To Mr. Erskine. Letter to Mr. Hollis. Letter to Mr. Hubbard · Part 3CHAPTER XXI. Vote of thanks of commissioners. Sermon at Newark. Measures of the enemies of the mission defeated. Letter to Mr. Oliver. “Freedom of the Will.” Letter to Mr. Erskine. Deposition of Mr. Gillespie. Letter to do. Letter to Mr. M'Cuulloch. Report of Indian agent. Reply of Mr. Edwards. Further defeat of the enemies of the missionCHAPTER XXII. Letter to his eldest son. Return of greater PART of the Mohawks. Letter to commissioners. Mission of Mr.Hawley to Onohquauga. Remainder of Mohawks directed to return. 'Freedom of the Will.' Letter to Mr. Erskine. Proposals of society in London. Letter to Mr. Gillespie. Design and character of the 'Freedom of the Will.' Letters from Mr. Hollis. Surrender of Mohawk school to Mr. Edwards. Entire defeat of enemies of mission. Return of remaining MohawksCHAPTER XXIII. Sickness of Mr. Edwards. “God's Last End in Creation.” “Nature of Virtue.” Mr. Edwards's second son resides at Onohquauga. Dangers of the war. Letter to Mr. Erskine. Letter to Col. Williams. Lord Kaimes. Letter to Mr. Erskine. Letter to Mr. M'Cullock. Letter of Dr. Bellamy. “Treatise on Original Sin.” Letter to his father. Letter to Mr. Erskine.CHAPTER XXIV. Death of President Burr. His character. Mr. Edwards chosen his successor. Letters of Mrs. Burr—To a gentleman in Scotland—To a gentleman in Boston—To her mother. Letter of Mr. Edwards, to the trustees of the college. Letter of Mrs. Burr, to her father. Letter to Dr. Rellamy. Council dismiss Mr. Edwards. Inauguration as president. First Sermon at Princeton. Sickness, Death. Letter of Dr. Shippen. Letters of Mrs. Edwards and of her daughter, to Mrs. Burr. Death of Mrs. Burr. Death of Mrs. Edwards.CHAPTER XXV. Concluding remarks · Part 1CHAPTER XXV. Concluding remarks · Part 2CHAPTER XXV. Concluding remarks · Part 3CHAPTER XXV. Concluding remarks · Part 4A Farewell Sermon · ON JUNE 32, 1750;A Farewell Sermon · PREFACE.A Farewell Sermon · APPLICATIONNO.NO.II. Particulars as to the Life and Death of Mr. Richard Edwards, the grandfather of Jonathan EdwardsNO.III. Account of the Children of Timothy and Esther Edwards.NO.IV. Remarks in Mental Philosophy. The Mind. · Part 1NO.IV. Remarks in Mental Philosophy. The Mind. · Part 2NO.IV. Remarks in Mental Philosophy. The Mind. · Part 3NO.IV. Remarks in Mental Philosophy. The Mind. · Part 4NO.IV. Remarks in Mental Philosophy. The Mind. · Part 5NO.V. Family and Descendants of President EdwardsNO. VIPreface.SECTION I. Concerning the Nature of the WillSECTION II. Concerning the Determination of the Will.SECTION III. Concerning the meaning of the terms, Necessity, Impossibility, Inability, &c. and of Contingence.SECTION IV Of the distinction of natural and moral Necessity, and Inability.SECTION V. Concerning the notion of Liberty, and of moral Agency.SECTION I. Showing the manifest inconsistence of the Arminian notion of Liberty of Will, consisting in the Will's self-determining Power.SECTION II. Several supposed ways of evading the foregoing reasoning, considered.SECTION III. Whether any Event whatsoever, and Volition in particular, can come to pass without a Cause of its existence.SECTION IV. Whether Volition can arise without a Cause, through the activity of the nature of the soul.SECTION V. Showing, that if the things asserted in these Evasions should be supposed to be true, they are altogether impertinent, and cannot help the cause of Arminian Liberty; and how, this being the state of the case, Arminian writers are obliged to talk inconsistently.SECTION VI. Concerning the Will determining in things which are perfectly indifferent in the view of the mind.SECTION VII. Concerning the notion of Liberty of Will, consisting in Indifference.SECTION VIII. Concerning the supposed Liberty of the Will, as opposite to all Necessity.SECTION IX. Of the Connexion of the Acts of the Will with the Dictates of the Understanding.SECTION X. Volition necessarily connected with the influence of Motives; with particular observations of the great inconsistence of Mr. Chubb's assertions and reasonings about the Freedom of the Will.SECTION XI. The evidence of God's certain Foreknowledge of the Volitions of moral Agents.SECTION XII. God's certain Foreknowledge of the future volitions of moral agents, inconsistent with such a Contingence of those violations as is without all Necessity.SECTION XIII. Whether we suppose the volitions of moral Agents to be connected with any thing antecedent, or not, yet they must be necessary in such a sense as to overthrow Arminian Liberty.SECTION I. God's moral Excellency necessary, yet virtuous and praise-worthy.SECTION II. The Acts of the Will of the human soul of Jesus Christ, necessarily holy, yet truly virtuous, praise-worthy, rewardable, &c.SECTION III. The case of such as are given up of God to sin, and of fallen man in general, proves moral Necessity and Inability to be consistent with Blameworthiness.SECTION IV. Command and Obligation of Obedience, consistent with moral Inability to obey.SECTION V. That Sincerity of Desires and Endeavours, which is supposed to excuse in the non-performance of things in themselves good, particularly considered.SECTION VI. Liberty of Indifference, not only not necessary to Virtue, but utterly inconsistent with it; and all, either virtuous or vicious habits or inclinations, inconsistent with Arminian notions of Liberty and moral Agency.SECTION VII. Arminian notions of moral Agency inconsistent with all influence of Motive and Inducement, in either virtuous or vicious actions.SECTION I. The Essence of the virtue and vice of dispositions of the heart, and acts of the Will, lies not in their Cause, but their Nature.SECTION II. The Falseness and Inconsistence of that metaphysical notion of Action, and Agency, which seems to be generally entertained by the defenders of the Arminian Doctrine concerning Liberty, moral Agency, &c.SECTION III. The reasons why some think it contrary to common Sense, to suppose those things which are necessary to be worthy of either Praise or Blame.SECTION IV. It is agreeable to common sense, and the natural notions of mankind, to suppose moral Necessity to be consistent with Praise and Blame, Reward and Punishment.SECTION V. Objections, that this scheme of Necessity renders all Means and Endeavours for avoiding Sin, or obtaining Virtue and Holiness, vain, and to no purpose; and that it makes men no more than mere machines, in affairs of morality and religion, answered.SECTION VI. Concerning that objection against the doctrine which has been maintained, that it agrees with the Stoical doctrine of Fate, and the opinions of Mr. Hobbes.SECTION VII. Concerning the Necessity of the Divine Will.SECTION VIII. Some further objections against the moral Necessity of God's Volitions considered.SECTION IX. Concerning that objection against the doctrine which has been maintained, that it makes God the Author of Sin.SECTION X. Concerning sin's first Entrance into the world.SECTION XI. Of a supposed Inconsistence between these principles and God's moral character.SECTION XII. Of a supposed tendency of these principles to Atheism and Licentiousness.SECTION XIII. Concerning that objection against the reasoning, by which the Calvinistic doctrine is supposed, that it is metaphysical and abstruse.SECTION XIV. The Conclusion.SECTION XV. Containing Remarks on the Essays on the Principles of Morality and Natural Religion, in a Letter to a Minister of the Church of Scotland.Preface.Introduction—Explanation of terms.SECTION I. The general dictates of reason.SECTION II. What reason supposes.SECTION III. How God regards himself.SECTION IV. Some objections considered.SECTION I. Scripture makes God his last end.SECTION II. Concerning a just method of arguing.SECTION III. Particular texts of Scripture.SECTION IV. God created the world for his name, &c.SECTION V. Communication of good to the creature.SECTION VI. What is meant by the glory of God, &c.SECTION VII. God's last end is but one.CHAPTER I. Concerning the essence of true virtue.CHAPTER II. How love respects different beings.CHAPTER III. Concerning the secondary beauty.CHAPTER IV. Of self-love and its influence.CHAPTER V. Natural conscience, and the moral sense.CHAPTER VI. Of particular instincts of natureCHAPTER VII. The reasons of many mistakesCHAPTER VIII. Whether virtue be founded in sentiment.VII. The great christian doctrine of original sin defended.Advertisement, containing a brief account of this book and its author, by the first editor.The author's Preface.SECTION I. All men tend to sin and ruin.SECTION II. Universal sin proves a sinful propensity.SECTION III. This tendency most corrupt and pernicious.SECTION IV. All men sin immediately, &c.SECTION V. All have more sin than virtue.SECTION VI. Men's proneness to extreme stupidity, &c.SECTION VII. Generality of mankind, wicked.SECTION VIII. Great means used to oppose wickedness.SECTION IX. Several evasions considered.CHAPTER II. Arguments from universal Mortality.SECTION I. Concerning Adam's original righteousness.SECTION II. Death threatened to our first parents.SECTION III. Adam a federal head, &c.CHAPTER II. Observations on Texts, chiefly of the Old Testament, &c.SECTION I. Observations on John iii.6.SECTION II. Observations on Rom. iii. 9-24.SECTION III. Observations on Rom. v. 6-10. and Eph. ii. 3SECTION I. Remarks on Dr. Taylor's way of explaining this text.SECTION II. The true scope of Rom. v. 12, &c.CHAPTER I. Proofs from Redemption by Christ.CHAPTER II. Proof from Application of Redemption.PART IV. Containing Answers to Objections.CHAPTER II. God not the Author of Sin.CHAPTER III. The Imputation of Adam's Sin stated.CHAPTER IV. Several other Objections answered.VIII. A TREATISE CONCERNING RELIGIOUS AFFECTIONS, IN THREE PARTS.PrefaceSECTION I. Previous remarks on the affections.SECTION II. True religion lies much in affections.SECTION III. Inferences from the doctrine.PART II. Showing what are no certain Signs that Religious Affections are truly gracious, or that they are not.SECTION I. Raised very high, are no sign.SECTION II. Great effects on the body, are no sign.SECTION III. Fluency and fervour, are no sign.SECTION IV. That they are not excited by us, is no sign.SECTION V. That they come with texts of Scripture, is no sign.SECTION IV. That they are not excited by us, is no sign.SECTION VII. Religious affections of many kinds, are no sign.SECTION VIII. Joys following in a certain order, are no sign.SECTION IX. Much time and zeal in duty, are no sign.SECTION X. Much expression of praise, is no sign.SECTION XI. Great confidence, is no certain sign.SECTION XII. Affecting relations, are no sign.Introductory remarks.SECTION I. Gracious affections are from divine influence. · Part 1SECTION I. Gracious affections are from divine influence. · Part 2SECTION I. Gracious affections are from divine influence. · Part 3SECTION II. Their object is the excellence of divine things.SECTION III. They are founded on the moral excellency of objects.SECTION IV. They arise from divine Illumination.SECTION V. They are attended with a conviction of certainty.SECTION VI. They are attended with evangelical humiliation. · Part 1SECTION VI. They are attended with evangelical humiliation. · Part 2SECTION VI. They are attended with evangelical humiliation. · Part 3SECTION VII. They are attended with a change of nature.SECTION VIII. They beget and promote the temper of Jesus.SECTION IX. Gracious affections soften the heart.SECTION X. They have beautiful symmetry and proportion.SECTION XI. False affections rest satisfied in themselves.SECTION XII. Their fruit is Christian practice.SECTION XIII. Christian practice is the chief sign to others.SECTION XIV. Christian practice is the chief sign to ourselves · Part 1SECTION XIV. Christian practice is the chief sign to ourselves · Part 2SECTION XIV. Christian practice is the chief sign to ourselves · Part 3SECTION XIV. Christian practice is the chief sign to ourselves · Part 4APPENDIX to the Treatise on the Affections.LETTER I. To Mr. Gillespie, in answer to objections.II. To Mr. Gillespie, in answer to further objections.PrefaceSECTION I. A general introductory statement.SECTION II. Manner of conversion various, yet bearing a great analogy. · Part 1SECTION II. Manner of conversion various, yet bearing a great analogy. · Part 2SECTION II. Manner of conversion various, yet bearing a great analogy. · Part 3SECTION III. This work further illustrated in particular instances.Preface.PART I. A glorious Work of God.SECTION I. We should judge of it by its effects.SECTION II. We should judge by Scripture.SECTION III. We should not judge of the whole by a part.SECTION IV. Nature of the work.SECTION V. Nature of the work in a particular instance.SECTION VI. The work glorious.SECTION I. Indifference dangerous.SECTION II. The probability that the latter-day glory will begin in America.SECTION III. The danger of slighting the work.SECTION IV. Obligations of rulers and others to promote the work.PART III. Wherein the zealous Promoters of this Work have been injuriously blamed.PART IV. What things are to be corrected and avoided.SECTION I. Spiritual pride.SECTION II. Wrong principles.SECTION III. Ignorance of inward experiences.SECTION IV. Of censuring professing Christians.SECTION V. Errors relative to lay-exhorting.SECTION VI. Errors relative to singing.PART V. What ought to be done to promote this work.SECTION I. We should remove stumbling blocks.SECTION II. What should be done to advance it.SECTION III. Some things that concern all.XI. INQUIRY CONCERNING QUALIFICATION FOR COMMUNION.Preface by the Author.Preface by the Author's American friends.Advertisement to the Edinburgh edition.PART I. The Question stated and explained.PART II. Reasons for the Negative of the Question.SECTION I. Church members should be visible saints.SECTION II. Profession of religion.SECTION III. Profession should be of real piety.SECTION IV. Reason requires a hearty profession.SECTION V. Christ requires it.SECTION VI. Primitive admissions.SECTION VII. The epistles prove it.SECTION VIII. Members united by brotherly love.SECTION IX. Qualifications for the Lord's supper.OBJ. I. The churchy is the school of Christ.OBJ. II. Israel was God's people.OBJ. III. Jews partook of the Passover.OBJ. IV. John's disciples made no profession of piety.OBJ. V. Many are called, but few chosen.OBJ. VI. Wheat and tares grow together.OBJ. VII. Case of Judas.OBJ. VIII. No certain rule given.OBJ. IX. If grace be required, it must be known.OBJ. X. Perplexity occasioned.OBJ. XI. All duties of worship holy.OBJ. XII. Tendency of the Lord's supper.OBJ. XIII. God does not require impossibilities.OBJ. XIV. Unsanctified persons may live as saints.OBJ. XV. Better admit hypocrites than exclude saints.OBJ. XVI. Hypocrites will be admitted.OBJ. XVII. True saints doubt of their state.OBJ. XVIII. Men's opinion of themselves no criterion.OBJ. XIX Infant baptism.OBJ. XX. Some have been converted at the sacrament.Appendix. Mr. Foxcroft's letter.XII. MISREPRESENTATIONS CORRECTED AND TRUTH VINDICATED, IN REPLY TO THE REV. SOLOMON WILLIAMS.Preface.SECTION I. What is the question?SECTION II. Degrees of evidence.SECTION I. His concessions.SECTION II. Consequences.SECTION III. Of ungodly men's communing.SECTION IV. Of an indeterminate profession.SECTION V. Mr. W. inconsistent with Mr. Stoddard.SECTION VI. Visibility without probability.SECTION VII. A converting ordinance.SECTION VIII. Of sincerity.SECTION IX. Public covenanting.SECTION I. Method of disputing.SECTION II. Misrepresentations.SECTION III. Irrelevant arguments.SECTION IV. Extraordinary notions.SECTION V. Assertions instead of arguments.SECTION VI. Sacramental actions.SECTION VII. Begging the question.SECTION VIII. Mr. W. begs the question.SECTION IX. Mr. W. is inconsistent with himself.SECTION X. Other inconsistencies.SECTION XI. Arguments hostile to both sidesSECTION XII. The passover and circumcision.SECTION XIII. Of Judas's communicating.SECTION XIV. Of being born in covenant.SECTION XV. Of coming without a known right.SECTION XVI. Tendency to perplexity.SECTION XVII. Of commanding to partake.Appendix. A letter to the people of Northampton.Preface.Advertisement.General Introduction.PERIOD I. From the Fall to the Incarnation.PART I. From the Fall to the Flood.PART II. From the Flood to the calling of Abraham.PART III. From Abraham to Moses.PART IV. From Moses to David.PART V. From David to the Babylonish Captivity. · Part 1PART V. From David to the Babylonish Captivity. · Part 2PART V. From David to the Babylonish Captivity. · Part 3PART VI. From the Captivity to Christ. · Part 1PART VI. From the Captivity to Christ. · Part 2PART VI. From the Captivity to Christ. · Part 3PART VII. Improvement of the First PERIOD.PERIOD II. From Christ's Incarnation to his Resurrection.PART I. Of Christ's Incarnation.PART II. The Purchase of Redemption.PART III. Improvement of the Second PERIOD.PERIOD III. From Christ's Resurrection the End of the World.SECTION I. Scriptural Representations of this PERIOD.SECTION II. How Christ was capacitated for effecting his Purpose.SECTION III. Established Means of Success.SECTION IV. How the Success was carried on.PART I. To the Destruction of Jerusalem.PART II. To the Time of Constantine.PART III. To the Rise of Antichrist.PART IV. To the Reformation.PART V. To the present Time.PART VI. Improvement of past Events.PART VII. To the Fall of Antichrist.PART VIII. To the End of Time.PART IX. The General JudgmentPART X. Improvement of the Whole.XIV Five discourses on the soul's eternal salvation.Preface.DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 1DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 2DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 3DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 4DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 5DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 6DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 7DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 8DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 9DISCOURSE. I. Justification by Faith alone. · Part 10DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 1DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 2DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 3DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 4DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 5DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 6DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 7DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 8DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 9DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 10DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 1DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 2DISCOURSE. II. Pressing into the Kingdom of God. · Part 3DISCOURSE. III. RuthDISCOURSE. IV. The Justice of God in the Damnation of Sinners. · Part 1DISCOURSE. IV. The Justice of God in the Damnation of Sinners. · Part 2DISCOURSE. IV. The Justice of God in the Damnation of Sinners. · Part 3DISCOURSE. IV. The Justice of God in the Damnation of Sinners. · Part 4DISCOURSE. V. The Excellency of Jesus Christ. · Part 1DISCOURSE. V. The Excellency of Jesus Christ. · Part 2DISCOURSE. V. The Excellency of Jesus Christ. · Part 3DISCOURSE. V. The Excellency of Jesus Christ. · Part 4XV THEOLOGICAL QUESTIONS.

Jonathan Edwards · 160 of 349

SECTION I. Gracious affections are from divine influence. · Part 1

Affections that arc truly spiritual and gracious, arise from those influences and operations on the heart, which are spiritual, supernatural, and divine.

I will explain what I mean by these terms, will appear their use to distinguish between those affections which are spiritual, and those which are not so.—We find that true , or those persons who are by the Spirit of God, are in the New Testament called spiritual persons. And their being spiritual is spoken of as their peculiar character, and that wherein they are distinguished from those who are not . This is evident, because those who are spiritual are set in opposition to natural men, and men. Thus the spiritual man and the natural man are set in opposition one to another, 1 Cor. ii. 14, 15. “The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he that is spiritual, judgeth all things.” The Scripture explains itself to mean an ungodly man, or one that has no , by a natural man: thus the apostle Jude, speaking of certain ungodly men, that had crept in unawares among the , (ver. 4. of his epistle,) says, ver. 19. “There are sensual, having not the Spirit.” This the apostle gives as a reason why they behaved themselves in such a wicked manner as he had described. Here the word NOT ENGLISH translated sensual, is the very same, which in 1 Cor. ii. 14, 15. is translated natural. In like manner, in the continuation of the same discourse, spiritual men are opposed to men; which the connexion plainly shows mean the same, as spiritual men and natural men, in the foregoing verses; “And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto ;” i. e. as in a great measure unsanctified. Now therefore, if by natural and , in these texts, be intended unsanctified, then doubtless by spiritual, which is opposed thereto, is meant and gracious. And as the are called spiritual in Scripture, so we also find that there are certain properties, qualities, and principles, that have the same epithet given them. So we read of a spiritual mind, Rom. viii. 6, 7. of spiritual wisdom, Col. i. 9. and of spiritual blessings, Eph. i. 3.

Now it may be observed, that the epithet spiritual, in these and other parallel texts of the New Testament, is not used to signify any relation of persons or things to the spirit or soul of man, as the spiritual part of man, in opposition to the body, or material part. Qualities are not said to be spiritual, because they have their seat in the soul, and not in the body: for there are some properties that the Scripture calls or fleshly, which have their seat as much in the soul, as those properties that are called spiritual, Thus pride and self-, and a man’s trusting to its own wisdom, the apostle calls fleshly, Col. ii. 18. Nor are things called spiritual, because they are conversant about those things that are immaterial, and not corporeal. For so was the wisdom of the wise men, and princes of this world, conversant about spirits, and immaterial beings; yet the apostle speaks of them as natural men, totally ignorant of those things that are spiritual, 1 Cor. chap. ii. But it is with relation to the , or Spirit of God, hat persons or things are termed spiritual, in the New Testament. Spirit, as the word is used to signify the third person in the , is the substantive, of which is formed the adjective spiritual in the Holy Scriptures. Thus christians are called spiritual persons, because they are born of the Spirit, and because of the indwelling and holy influences of the Spirit of God in them. And things are called spiritual as related to the Spirit of God; 1 Cor. ii. 13, 14. “Which things also we speak, not in the words man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God.” Here the apostle himself expressly signifies, that by spiritual things, he means the things of the Spirit of God, and things which the teacheth. The same is yet more abundantly apparent by viewing the whole context. Again, Rom. viii. 6. To be minded, is death; to be spiritually minded, is life and peace. The apostle explains what he means by being and spiritually minded, in what follows in the 9th verse, and shows that by being spiritually minded he means, having the indwelling and holy influences of the Spirit of God in the heart. But ye are not in the flesh, butIN the spirit, if so be the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. The same is evident by all the context. But time would fail to produce all the evidence of this in the New Testament.

And it must be here observed, that although it is with relation to the Spirit of God and his influences, that persons and things are called spiritual; yet not all those persons who are subject to any kind of influence of the Spirit of God, are ordinarily called so in the New Testament. They who have only the common influences of God’s Spirit, are not so called, in the places cited above. It has been already proved, that by spiritual men is meant godly men, in opposition to natural, , and unsanctified men. And it is most plain, that the apostle by spiritually minded, Rom. viii. 6. means graciously minded. And though the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit, which natural men might have, are sometimes called spiritual, because they are from the Spirit; yet natural men, whatever gifts of the Spirit they had, were not, in the usual language of the New Testament, called spiritual persons. For it was not by men’s having the gifts, but the virtues of the Spirit, that they are called spiritual; as is apparent, by Gal. vi. l. “Brethren, if any man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of .” is one of those virtues which the apostle had just spoken of in the verses next preceding, showing what are the fruits of the Spirit. Those qualifications, therefore, are said to be spiritual in the language of the New Testament, which are truly gracious, and peculiar to the .

Thus when we read of spiritual wisdom and understanding—as in Col. i. 9. “We desire that ye may be filled with the knowledge of his will, in all wisdom and spiritual, understanding”—hereby is intended that wisdom which is gracious, and from the influences of the Spirit of God. For, doubtless, by spiritual wisdom, is meant that which is opposite to what the Scripture calls natural wisdom; as the spiritual man is opposed to the natural man. And therefore spiritual wisdom is doubtless the same with that wisdom which is from above, James iii. 17. “The wisdom that is from above, is first pure, then peaceable, gentle,”. &c. for this the apostle opposes to natural wisdom, ver. 15. “This wisdom descendeth not from above, but is earthly, sensual”—the last word in the original is the same that is translated natural, in 1 Cor. ii. 14.

So that although natural men may be the subjects of many influences of the Spirit of God, as is evident by many scriptures, yet they are not in the sense the Scripture spiritual persons; neither are any of those effects, common gifts, qualities, or affections, that are from the influence of the Spirit of God upon them, called spiritual things. The great difference lies in these two things.

1. The Spirit of God is given to the true to dwell in them, as his proper lasting abode; and to influence their hearts, as a principle of new nature, or as a divine supernatural spring of life and action. The Scriptures represent .the Holy Spirit, not only as moving, and occasionally influencing, the , but as dwelling in them as his temple, his proper abode, and everlasting dwelling-place, (1 Cor. iii. 16. 2 Cor. vi. 16. John xiv. 16,17.) And he is represented as being there so united to the faculties of the soul, that he becomes there a principle or spring of a new nature and life.

So the are said to live by Christ living in them, Gal. ii. 20. Christ by his Spirit not only is in them, but lives in them; they live by his life. His Spirit is united to them, as a principle of life in them. They not only drink living water, but this living water becomes a well or fountain of water, in the soul, springing up into spiritual and everlasting life, John iv. 14. and thus becomes a principle of lire in them—this living water the evangelist himself explains to intend the Spirit of God, ( chap. vii. 38, 39.) The light of the Sun of does not only shine upon them, but is so communicated to them that they shine also, and become little images of that sun which shines upon them. The sap of the true vine is not only conveyed into them, as the sap of a tree may be conveyed into a vessel, but is conveyed as sap is from a tree into one of its living branches, where it becomes a principle of life. The Spirit of God being thus communicated and united to the , they are from properly denominated from it, and are called spiritual.

On the other hand, though the Spirit of God may many ways influence natural men; yet because it is not thus communicated to them, as an indwelling principle, they do not derive any denomination or character from it; for there being no union, it is not their own. The light may shine upon a body that is very dark or black; and though that body be the subject of the light, yet, because the light becomes no principle of light to it, so as to cause the body to shine, hence that body does not properly receive its denomination from it, so as to be called a lightsome body. So the Spirit of God acting upon the soul only, without communicating itself to be an active principle in it, cannot denominate it spiritual. A body that continues black, may be said not to have light, though the light shines upon it: so natural men are said not to have the Spirit,Jude 19. sensual or natural, as the word is elsewhere rendered, having not the Spirit.

2. Another reason why the and their virtues are called spiritual, (and which is the principal thing.) is, that the Spirit of God, dwelling as a vital principle in the souls, produces there those effects wherein he exerts and communicates himself in his own proper nature. is the nature of the Spirit of God, therefore he is called in Scripture the . , which is as it were the beauty and sweetness of the divine nature, is as much the proper nature of the Holy Spirit, as heat is the nature of fire, or sweetness was the nature of that holy anointing oil, which was the principal type of the in the Mosaic dispensation. Yea, I may rather say, that is as much the proper nature of the , as sweetness was the nature of the sweet odour of that ointment. The Spirit of God so dwells in the hearts of the , that he there, as a seed or spring of life, exerts and communicates himself, in this his sweet and divine nature. He makes the soul a partaker of God’s beauty and Christ’s joy, so that the has truly fellowship with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ, in thus having the communion or participation of the . The which is in the hearts of the , is of the name nature with the divine , though infinitely less in degree; as the brightness in a diamond which the sun shines upon, is of the same nature with the brightness of the sun, but only that it is as nothing to it in degree. Therefore Christ says, John iii. 6. “That which is born of the Spirit, is spirit,” i. e. the that is begotten in the hearts of the , is something of the same nature with that Spirit, and so is properly called a spiritual nature; after the same manner as that which is born of the flesh is flesh, or that which is born of corrupt nature is corrupt nature.

But the Spirit of God never influences the minds of natural men after this manner. Though he may influence them many ways, yet he never, in any of his influences, communicates himself to them in his own proper nature. Indeed he never acts disagreeably to his nature, either on the minds of or sinners: but the Spirit of God may act upon men agreeably to his own nature, and not exert his proper nature in the acts and exercises of their minds. The Spirit of God may act so, that his actions may be agreeable to his nature, and yet may not at all communicate himself in his proper nature, in the effect of that action. Thus, for instance, the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters, and there was nothing disagreeable to his nature in that action; but yet he did not at all communicate himself in that action, there was nothing of the proper nature of the Holy Spirit in that motion of the waters. And so he may act upon the minds of men many ways, and not communicate himself any more than when he acts on inanimate things.

Thus, not only the manner of the Spirit’s relation to the subject of his operations, is different; but the influence and operation itself, and the effect wrought, exceeding different. So that not only the persons are called spiritual, as having the Spirit of God dwelling in them; but those qualifications, affections, and experiences that are wrought in them by the Spirit, are also spiritual. Therein they differ vastly in their nature and kind from all that a natural man can be the subject of, while he remains in a natural state; and also from all that of which men or devils can be the authors. It is a spiritual work in this high sense; and therefore above all other works is peculiar to the Spirit of God. There is no work so high and excellent; for there is no work wherein God doth so much communicate himself, and wherein the mere creature hath, in so high a sense, a participation of God; so that it is expressed in Scripture by the being made partakers of the divine, nature, 2 Pet. i. 4. and having God dwelling in them, and they in God, 1 John iv. 12, 15, 16. and chap. iii. 21. and having Christ in them, John xvii. 21. Rom. viii. 10. being the temples of the living God, 2 Cor. vi. 16. living by Christ’s life, Gal. ii. 20. being made partakers of God’s , Heb. xii. 10. having Christ’s love dwelling in them, John xvii. 26. having his joy fulfilled in them, John xvii. 13. seeing light in God’s light, and being made to drink of the river of God’s pleasures, Ps. xxxvi. 8, 9. having fellowship with God, or communicating and partaking with him, (as the word signifies,) 1 John i. 3. Not that the are made partakers of the essence, of God—or godded with God, and christed with Christ, according to the blasphemous language of some heretics—but, to use the scripture phrase, they are made partakers of God’s fulness, (Eph. iii. 17-19. John i. 16.) that is, of God’s spiritual beauty and happiness, according to the measure and capacity of a creature. So the word fulness signifies in scripture language. in the hearts of the being therefore the most glorious work of God, wherein he communicates of the goodness of his nature, it is doubtless his peculiar work, and in an eminent manner above the power of all creatures. And this is what I mean by those influences that are divine, when I say, that truly gracious affections arise from those influences that are spiritual and divine.

True only have that which is spiritual; others not only have not these communications of the Spirit in so high a degree as the , but have nothing of that nature or kind. For the apostle James tells us, that natural men have not the Spirit; and Christ teaches the necessity of a , or a being born of the Spirit, from this, that he that is born of the flesh, has only flesh, and no spirit, John iii. 6. They have not the Spirit of God dwelling in them in any degree; for the apostle teaches, that all who have the Spirit of God dwelling in them are his, Rom. viii. 9-11.. And, having the Spirit of God is spoken of as a certain sign, that persons shall have the eternal inheritance; for it is the earnest of it, (2 Cor. i. 22. and v. 5. Eph. i. 14.) and having any thing of the Spirit is mentioned as a sure sign of being in Christ, 1 John iv. 13. “Hereby know we that we dwell in him, because he bath given us of his Spirit.” Ungodly men not only have not so much of the divine nature as the , but they are not partakers of it; which implies that they have nothing of it; for a being partaker of the divine nature is spoken of as the peculiar privilege of the true , 2 Pet. i. 4. Ungodly men are not partaken of God’s , Heb. xii. 10. A natural man has no experience of those things that are spiritual: he is so far from it, that he knows nothing about them, and is a perfect stranger to them. To talk about such things is all foolishness to him, he knows not what it means, 1 Cor. ii. 14. “The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God; for they are foolishness to him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.” And to the like purpose Christ teaches us that the world is wholly unacquainted with the Spirit of God, John xiv. 17. “Even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him.” And it is further evident, that natural men have nothing in them of the same nature with the true of the , because the apostle teaches us, that those of them who go farthest in religion, have no , or true christian love, ( chap. xiii.) So Christ elsewhere reproves the , those high pretenders to religion, that they had not the love of God in them, John v. 42. Hence natural men have no communion or fellowship with Christ, or participation with him, as these words signify, for this is spoken of as the peculiar privilege of the , (1 John i. 3, 6, 7. and 1 Cor. i. 8, 9.) And the Scripture speaks of the actual existence of a gracious principle in the soul, though in its first beginning, like a seed planted there, as inconsistent with a man’s being a sinner, 1 John iii. 9. And natural men are represented in Scripture, as having no spiritual light, no spiritual life, and no spiritual being; and therefore is often compared to opening the eyes of the blind, raising the dead, and a work of creation, wherein creatures are made entirely new, and becoming new-born children.

From these things it is evident, that those gracious influences of the , and the effects of God’s Spirit which they experience, are entirely above nature, and altogether of a different kind from any thing that men find in themselves by the exercise of natural principles. No improvement of those principles that are natural, no advancing or exalting of them to higher degrees, and no kind of composition, will ever bring men to them; because they not only differ from what is natural, and from every thing that natural men experience, in degree and circumstances, but also in kind; and are of a nature vastly more excellent. And this is what I mean by supernatural, when I say, that gracious affections are from those influences that are supernatural.

From hence it follows, that in those gracious exercises and affections which are wrought in the , through the saving influences of the Spirit of God, there is a new inward perception or sensation of their minds, entirely different in its nature and kind from any thing that ever their minds were the subjects of before they were . For, if God by his mighty power produces something that is new, not only in degree and circumstances, but in its whole nature—all that which could be produced by no exalting, varying, or compounding of what was there before, or by adding any thing of the like kind—then, doubtless, something entirely new is felt, or perceived. There is what some metaphysicians call a new simple idea. If be, in the sense above described, an entirely new kind of principle; then the exercises of it are also new. And if there be in the soul a new sort of conscious exercises, which the soul knew nothing of before, and which no improvement, composition, or management of what it was before could produce; then it follows that the mind has an entirely new kind of perception or sensation. Here is, as it were, a new spiritual sense, or a principle of new kind of perception or spiritual sensation, which is in its whole nature different from any former kinds of sensation of the mind, as tasting is diverse from any of the other senses. And something is perceived by a true , in the exercise of “this new sense of mind in spiritual and divine things, as entirely diverse from any thing that is perceived in them by natural men, as the sweet taste of honey is diverse from the ideas men get of honey by only looking on and feeling it. So that the spiritual perceptions which a and spiritual person has, are not only diverse from all that natural men have as the perceptions of the same sense may differ one from another, but rather as the ideas and sensations of different senses differ. Hence the work of the Spirit of God in is often in Scripture compared to the giving of a new sense, eyes to see, ears to hear, unstopping the ears of the deaf, opening the eyes of them that were born blind, and turning from darkness unto light. And because this spiritual sense is immensely the most noble and excellent, and that without which all other principles of perception, and all our faculties, are useless and vain; therefore the giving of this new sense, with the blessed fruits and effects of it in the soul, is compared to raising the dead, and to a new creation.

This new spiritual sense, and the new dispositions that attend it, are no new faculties, but new principles of nature: I use the word principles, for want of a word of a more determinate signification. By a principle of nature in this place, I mean that foundation which is laid in nature, either old or new, for any particular manner or kind of exercise of the faculties of the soul; or a natural habit, or foundation for action, giving a person ability and disposition to exert the faculties in exercises of such a certain kind; so, that to exert the faculties in that kind of exercises, may be said to be his nature. So this new spiritual sense is not anew faculty of understanding, but it is a new foundation laid in the nature of the soul, for a new kind of exercises of the same faculty of understanding. So that the new holy disposition of heart that attends this new sense, is not a new faculty of will, but a foundation laid in the nature of the soul, for a new kind of exercises of the same faculty of will.

The Spirit of God, in all his operations upon the minds of natural men, only moves, impresses, assists, improves, or some way acts upon natural principles; but gives no new spiritual principle. Thus when the Spirit of God gives a natural man visions, as he did Balaam, he only impresses a natural principle—the sense of seeing, immediately exciting ideas of that sense—but gives no new sense; neither is there any thing supernatural, spiritual, or divine in it. If the Spirit of God impresses on a man’s imagination, either in a dream, or when he is awake, any outward ideas of any of the senses, either voices or shapes and colours, it is only exciting ideas of the same kind that he has by natural principles and senses. So if God reveals to a natural man any secret fact; for instance, something that he shall hereafter see or hear; this is not infusing or exercising any new spiritual principle, or giving the ideas of any new spiritual sense; it is only impressing, in an extraordinary manner, the ideas that will hereafter be received by sight and hearing. So in the more ordinary influences of the Spirit of God on the hearts of sinners, he only assists natural principles to do the same work to a greater degree, which they do of themselves by nature. Thus the Spirit of God by his common influences may assist men’s natural ingenuity, as he assisted Bezaleel and Aholiab in the curious works of the tabernacle. He may assist men’s natural abilities in political affairs, and improve their courage and other natural qualifications; as he is said to have put his Spirit on the seventy elders, and on Saul, so as to give him another heart. God may greatly assist natural men’s reason, in their reasoning about secular things, or about the doctrines of religion, and may greatly advance the clearness of their apprehensions and notions in many respects, without giving any spiritual sense. So in those awakenings and that natural men may have, God only assists conscience, which is a natural principle, to do that work in a further degree, which it naturally does. Conscience naturally gives men an apprehension of right and wrong, and suggests the relation there is between them and a retribution. The Spirit of God assists men’s consciences to do this in a greater degree, and against the stupifying influence of objects and their lusts. Many other ways might be mentioned, wherein the Spirit acts upon, assists, and moves natural principles; but after all, it is no more than nature moved, acted, and improved; here is nothing supernatural and divine. But the Spirit of God in his spiritual influences on the hearts of his , operates by infusing or exercising new, divine, and supernatural principles; principles which are indeed a new and spiritual nature, and principles vastly more noble and excellent than all that is in natural men.

From what has been said it follows, that all spiritual and gracious affections are attended with, and arise from. some apprehension, idea, or sensation of mind, which is in its whole nature different, yea exceeding different, from all that is or can be in the mind of a natural man. The natural man discerns nothing of it, (1 Cor. ii. 14.) any more than a man without the sense of tasting can conceive of the sweet taste of honey; or a man without the sense of hearing can conceive of the melody of a tune; or a man born blind can have a notion of the beauty of the rainbow.

But here two things must be observed, in order to the right understanding of this.

1. On the one hand it must be observed, that not every thing which appertains to spiritual affections, is new and entirely different from what natural men experience; some things are common to gracious affections with other affections; many circumstances, appendages, and effects are common. Thus a ’s love to God has a great many things appertaining to it, which are common with a man’s natural love to a near relation. Love to God makes a man seek the honour of God, and desire to please him; so docs a natural man’s love to his friend make him desire his honour, and to please him. Love to God causes a man to delight in the thoughts of him, in his presence; to desire conformity to God, and the enjoyment of him; and so it is with a man’s love to his friend. Many other things might be mentioned which are common to both. But yet, that idea which the has of the loveliness of God, and the kind of delight he has in that view which is as it were the marrow and quintessence of his love, is peculiar, and entirely diverse from any thing that a natural man has, or can have any notion of. And even in those things that seem to be common, there is something peculiar. Both spiritual love and natural, cause desires after the object beloved; but they are not the same sort of desires; there is a sensation of soul in the spiritual desires of one that loves God, which is entirely different from all natural desires. Both spiritual and natural love are attended with delight in the object beloved; but the sensations of delight are not the same, but entirely and exceedingly diverse. Natural men may have conceptions of many things about spiritual affections; but there is something in them which is as it were the nucleus, or kernel, of which they have no more conceptions, than one born blind has of colours.